CLUNKY AI

Clunky Index

A live benchmark for whether business websites are ready.

The Index turns completed Clunky AI scans into a rolling view of how business websites perform across speed, findability, accessibility, trust, action and credible copy.

Current benchmark average

63/ 100

Clunky

Early view: the latest 90-day benchmark has 1 scan. The number proves the pipeline is collecting data, but it is not a stable market benchmark yet.

Window

20 Jan 2026 to 20 Apr 2026

Sample

1 scan

Confidence

Early sample

What this is

A benchmark

A rolling aggregate of completed website scans. It is built from the same six-basic scoring model used in every individual report.

What it measures

Readiness

Higher scores mean fewer blockers across speed, findability, accessibility, trust, action and credible copy.

What it is not

Not a scrape

It is not a list of every site on the web, and it does not publish private scan reports. Public numbers are aggregated.

How to read the score

Higher is better. The score is a readiness score, not a shame score. It asks whether the site is ready to do its job across the six basics.

85-100SharpRare. Strong enough to use as a benchmark.
70-84GoodWorking, with a few visible places to tighten.
55-69ClunkyThe normal danger zone for SMB websites.
40-54Very clunkyImportant basics are costing trust or action.
0-39BrokenFix before treating the site as reliable.

How to use it

Read it as context, not a trophy cabinet.

If your site scores below the Index average, the question is not whether the site is embarrassing. The question is which basic is costing attention, trust or action first.

If your site scores above the average but below the top quartile, the opportunity is usually a focused cleanup rather than a full rebuild.

If your site reaches the top quartile, keep monitoring it. New AI-built websites, new browser behaviour and new content patterns move the benchmark over time.

Distribution

The spread appears once there is enough spread to show.

Right now the Index has 1 scan in the current window. Quartiles become useful once there are several results to compare.

4 more scans and this section will start showing the distribution.

Six-basic breakdown

Which basics are dragging sites down?

These are category averages across the current benchmark. They help readers see whether the market is mainly failing on speed, findability, accessibility, trust, action or credible copy.

Does it load fast enough?

Performance & Technical · 20% weight

Mobile speed, Core Web Vitals, HTTPS, SSL and HTTP/2.

77

Average

Will anyone find it?

SEO & Discoverability · 20% weight

Search metadata, headings, structured data, robots, sitemap and crawlable content.

40

Average

Can everyone actually use it?

Accessibility · 15% weight

axe-core violations in the rendered page.

70

Average

Does it feel trustworthy?

Trust + visual polish · 15% weight

Trust markers, policy basics, structured organization data and visual polish.

15

Average

Does it help people take action?

Conversion + layout · 15% weight

Above-fold calls to action, form basics, layout clarity and funnel focus.

80

Average

Does the copy feel credible?

Copy Credibility · 15% weight

Specificity, sentence rhythm, repeated phrasing and generic AI-shaped wording.

--

Average

Builder signals

AI builders are shown as signals, not accusations.

The scanner detects builder fingerprints where it can. We publish builder-level rankings only once there are 30+ recent samples, so early rows should be read as directional diagnostics.

Scores describe websites in the detected sample, not every site made with that builder and not the builder company itself.